MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reconsidering Community-based Retailing

2012· article· en· W39570762 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rebecca Maughan, Aidan O’Driscoll

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More than 55% of U.S. lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) production is in California, with Monterey Co. being the largest producer. Stunted mature romaine 'Valencia' and 'Stomper' and iceberg 'Frazier' lettuces with wilted outer leaves were collected from five commercial fields in Monterey Co. in spring 2023 and 2024. Brown internal stem and crown lesions progressed into sunken cavities and plant collapse. Incidence was approximately 5 to 75%. Margins of discolored stem and crown tissue were surface sterilized and plated on PARP-CMA (Jeffers and Martin 1986) and colonies resembling Phytophthora were recovered. Papillate sporangia ranged from 42 to 67.5 × 25 to 45 μm (avg. 56.1 × 37.0 μm, n = 30) and a length/breadth ratio of 1.4 to 1.7 (avg. 1.5). Globose, intercalary or terminal chlamydospores, 20 to 45 µm in diameter (avg. 32.6 µm, n = 30), and oospores, 17 to 29 μm in diameter (avg. 23.9 μm, n = 30) formed on 10 to 12-day-old cultures. Sequences from the two primary barcodes, ITS and COI (Robideau et al. 2011) were obtained from isolates collected from five different host cultivars and locations, finding identical multi-locus genotypes. ITS chromatograms contained six double-peaks, indicating interspecific hybridization. COI found the lettuce isolates forming a clade with the provisional P. taxon castitis, in Subclade 8b where hybrids are common (Bertier et al. 2013). If P. taxon castitis ITS is used as one parental ITS haplotype, the other haplotype is 1 bp different from P. lactucae and P. pseudolactucae ITS, suggesting one is the other parent of this hybrid taxon, provisionally introduced here as P. taxon ×salinaslettuce with accessions PQ427275-9 (ITS), and PQ424946-50 (COI). Pathogenicity assays were conducted on lettuce cultivars 'Bondi', 'El Guapo', and 'Valencia' (seven-week-old; 473-ml pots; 5 pots each for 'Bondi' and 'El Guapo', and 2 pots for 'Valencia'). Phytophthora inoculum of isolate 5411 was prepared as described in Hao et al. (2019) with oat seed replaced with long grain rice. Ten milliliter inoculum was added into two 6-cm-deep holes on opposite sides of the main stem. A non-colonized mixture was added to an equal number of control plants. All plants were maintained in a growth chamber with a 12-h photoperiod at 20°C/18°C. After one week, 'Bondi' and 'El Guapo' inoculated plants were stunted, and after two weeks, older leaves were chlorotic and wilted. After three weeks, 80% of the plants collapsed. Dark brown internal lesions were seen along the stem, crown, and tap roots of the collapsed plants after four weeks. 'Valencia' inoculated plants were stunted with no internal tissue discoloration observed over the same period. No symptoms were observed on any control plants; P. taxon ×salinaslettuce was reisolated and confirmed via ITS sequence from symptomatic stems, crowns, and tap roots of 'Bondi' and 'El Guapo', as well as non-symptomatic feeder roots of all three cultivars. No Phytophthora was recovered from the controls. This is the first report of P. taxon ×salinaslettuce detection on lettuce; P. taxon castitis has been isolated from strawberry and carrot in Sweden and Canada (Bertier et al. 2013), while P. lactucae and P. pseudolactucae have only been reported on lettuce in Greece and Japan (Elena et al. 2006; Rahman et al. 2015). Plans are underway to confirm the hybrid status and parentage of P. taxon ×salinaslettuce using genomics. This emerging pathogen may cause severe economic losses in CA lettuce production during the winter and spring growing seasons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207