Les indiens au sein de la confederation canadienne de 1867 a nos jours. Aspects politiques et juridiques.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les reserves amerindiennes apparaissent a la fois comme des lieux d'exclusion geographique de leurs residents et comme une prerogative territoriale des nations amerindiennes souveraines. Leurs residents sont en general des exclus du pouvoir economique selon les criteres de la societe dominante. La participation des premieres nations au tissu canadien se definit ainsi sur deux plans : celui des communautes amerindiennes et celui des individus. Malgre la perspective assimilatrice des autorites coloniales, puis federales, les premieres nations ont reussi a conserver une partie de leur souverainete. Hors reserve, en milieu urbain, certains amerindiens parviennent a s'inserer a la societe dominante si la de-culturation inherente a tout deracinement est remplacee par le systeme de valeurs anglo-saxon. Neanmoins, beaucoup retournent vivre dans les reserves. En tant que telle, l'adaptation au courant dominant souleve la question de l'acculturation et celle de la survie de l'indianite. Qu'elles y adherent ou non, les communautes amerindiennes sont en butte au syncretisme culturel, tant au plan economique que sur le plan conceptuel. Depuis les annees 1970, on observe cependant une rupture dans l'orientation de la politique federales vis-a-vis des premieres nations. Ces trois dernieres decennies l'assimilation totale des premieres nations ne semble plus etre la priorite des autorites federales canadiennes. Une assimilation partielle semblerait suffire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".