MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Whiteness of Educational Policymaking

2015· book-chapter· en· W396830788 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul R. Carr

Bibliographic record

VenueTransgressions · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Race Theory in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismNeglectGovernment (linguistics)Power (physics)Institutional racismEconomic JusticePolitical scienceSociologyWhite paperWhite (mutation)Social justiceCriminologyGender studiesPsychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How do governments and educational decision-makers consistently avoid being held to account for social justice?1 Why do reforms routinely ignore or omit dealing with racism? Is this institutional response merely willful neglect, systemic dysfunction, a contrived, intricate web of inequitable power relations, or is it the fomenting of ingrained racist interests? What is the role of White people in sustaining and shaping racism? This chapter focuses on Whiteness within an institutional environment in education by examining the case of the Ontario government and educational policymaking in 1995.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransgressionsSame topicCritical Race Theory in EducationFrench-language works237,207