MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W397035786

The next step in studying religion : a graduate's guide

2007· book· en· W397035786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mathieu E. Courville

Bibliographic record

VenueContinuum eBooks · 2007
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlessingSociologyChapelClinical neuropsychologyReligious studiesArt historyMedia studiesTheologyHistoryPhilosophyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface Mathieu E. Courville (University of Ottawa) - Editor's Introduction: On Reaching for the Other Shore Part I: Larry Patriquin (Nipissing University) - How to Finish a Ph.D. Dissertation in this Lifetime: Marbles of Wisdom Revisited Professor Russell T. McCutcheon (University of Alabama) - Theses on the Job Market Michel Desjardin (Wilfrid Laurier University) - Netting a Job in Religious Studies Kay Koppendrayer (Wilfrid Laurier University) - Some Thoughts and Advice on Academic Publishing Part II: Harold Coward (Emeritus, University of Victoria) - Education: Place Where Past and Future Meet Klaus Klostermaier (Emeritus, University of Manitoba) - Events, People, and Circumstances: Looking Back at a Largely Unplanned Academic Career in Religious Studies Marc H. Ellis (Baylor University) - Caution! Prospective Graduate Students of Religion in Judaism and Islam Donald A. Crosby (Emeritus, Colorado State University) - A Student's Question: Religious Studies, Philosophy, and the Examined Life Richard C. Martin (Emory University) - essay title to follow Carolyn Sharp (St. Paul University, Ottawa) - Un-domestic Conversations: Crossing Borders, Transgressing Boundaries and Contested Territories David Chidester (University of Cape Town) - Studying Religion in South Africa Vern Neufeld Redekop (St. Paul University, Ottawa) - Teachings of Blessing as Elements of Reconciliation: Intra and Inter-Religious Hermeneutical Challenges and Opportunities in the Face of Violent Deep-Rooted Conflict Darlene Juschka (University of Regina) - Sunday Mornin' Comin' Down: Waking Up in Women's Studies Jon R. Stone (California State University, Long Beach) - essay title to follow Charles H. Long (Emeritus, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) - essay title still undetermined About the Authors Index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContinuum eBooksSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207