MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 1105: Gadofluorine M-Cy 3, a Novel Paramegnetic Contrast Agent for the in vivo and Histolgical Identification of Transplanted Cells.

2007· article· en· W39842159 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Adler, Anne Bystrup, Karen Briley Sæbø, Venketesh Mani, Steve Giovannone, W. Glenn Young, Joseph A. Frank, Joachim Weinmann, Gordon Keller, Zahi A. Fayad

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vivoFluorescence microscopeStem cellMedicineEmbryonic stem cellIron oxideTransplantationCellProgenitor cellContrast (vision)StainingViability assayPathologyOxideFluorescenceBiochemistryCell biologyChemistryBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Gadofluorine M with a fluorescent dye (GdFMCy3) is a lipophilic paramegnetic contrast agent that is readily absorbed by cultured cells. We hypothesized that this agent would be superior to iron oxide based techniques for cell tracking post cell transplantation. METHODS: Embryonic Stem Cell derived cardiac progenitor cells (ES-CPCs) were generated using previously established methods and incubated for 12 hours with 5 mM GdFMCy3, or transfected with iron oxide using published protocols. Cell survival was >95% for cells incubated with both GdFMCy3 and iron. 500,000 cells labelled with GdFMCy3, iron oxide or control (no contrast agent) were directly injected into the myocardium of mice (n=5/group). Mice were scanned over a two week interval post injection at 9.4T using gated T1-weighted sequences (GdFMCy3), T2* weighted GRE sequences (iron oxide) or the positive contrast sequence GRASP (iron oxide). Mice were sacrificed and the hearts sectioned for microscopy. Perl staining and fluorescence microscopy were used to identify iron oxide and GdFMCy3 within the myocardium, respectively. RESULTS: GdFMCy3 labelled cells were successfully identified in vivo at 9.4T (figure panel B). Good correlation between MRI and histology was observed for both cell labels (figure ). Contrast to noise ratios were significantly higher in the GdFMCy3 group relative to the iron oxide group (figure ). CONCLUSIONS: GdFM-Cy3 is readily taken up by stem cells and easily identified by both MRI and fluorescence microscopy. Given its superior contrast to noise ratio GdFM-Cy3 may be an excellent alternative to iron oxide for in vivo detection and tracking of transplanted cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207