MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W39904068

A simple sketching algorithm for entropy estimation over streaming data.

2013· article· en· W39904068 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Clifford, Ioana A. Cosma

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Stream Mining Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRényi entropyEstimatorMathematicsEntropy (arrow of time)Maximum entropy probability distributionMin entropyJoint entropyEntropy estimationShannon's source coding theoremStreaming algorithmComputationUpper and lower boundsEntropy rateApplied mathematicsAlgorithmPrinciple of maximum entropyStatisticsJoint quantum entropyMaximum entropy thermodynamicsMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of approximating the empirical Shannon entropy of a highfrequency data stream under the relaxed strict-turnstile model, when space limitations make exact computation infeasible. An equivalent measure of entropy is the Renyi entropy that depends on a constant α. This quantity can be estimated efficiently and unbiasedly from a low-dimensional synopsis called an α-stable data sketch via the method of compressed counting. An approximation to the Shannon entropy can be obtained from the Renyi entropy by taking α sufficiently close to 1. However, practical guidelines for parameter calibration with respect to α are lacking. We avoid this problem by showing that the random variables used in estimating the Renyi entropy can be transformed to have a proper distributional limit as α approaches 1: the maximally skewed, strictly stable distribution with α = 1 defined on the entire real line. We propose a family of asymptotically unbiased log-mean estimators of the Shannon entropy, indexed by a constant ζ > 0, that can be computed in a single-pass algorithm to provide an additive approximation. We recommend the log-mean estimator with ζ = 1 that has exponentially decreasing tail bounds on the error probability, asymptotic relative efficiency of 0.932, and near-optimal computational complexity. Appearing in Proceedings of the 16 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) 2013, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. Volume 31 of JMLR: W&CP 31. Copyright 2013 by the authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and StatisticsSame topicData Stream Mining TechniquesFrench-language works237,207