Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo rescata, desde la esclavitud, un contradiscurso del romanticismo. Se enfoca en cómo la poesía de Juan Francisco Manzano, escritor cubano y ex-esclavo, reescribe el afecto típico del romanticismo cubano. Para Manzano, es la esclavitud la que se interpone entre los amantes y la que engendra, lejos de una patria anhelada desde afuera, la fantasía de escaparse de la isla y de los terrores asociados con el terreno cubano. Por ende, este ensayo reflexiona más detenidamente sobre la figura - poética, jurídica y ecológica - del “suelo” en varias obras. En particular, se compara un poema de José María Heredia de 1835 con otro de Manzano, publicado en 1838, en el que éste parece retomar y resignificar unas palabras del primero:la frase de Heredia “Huyamos pues, este suelo delicioso” deviene en Manzano “Huyamos pues, ... nuestro enemigo suelo”. Como conclusión, el ensayo destaca las implicaciones de tal reescritura para repensar la ecología y el afecto durante el apogeo de la esclavitud cubana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".