Seasonal and interannual variability of primary and secondary productivity in a coastal fjord
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phytoplankton and zooplankton dynamics in a coastal fjord in British Columbia were monitored in spring and early summer 2006 and 2007 to assess the annual variability in primary and secondary productivity and some characteristics of subsequent production. Phytoplankton biomass increased dramatically in early spring (spring bloom), declined abruptly, and then increased to a smaller peak two weeks after the spring bloom. Mesozooplankton biomass peaked one month after the spring bloom. The timing of the spring bloom was 20 days later in 2007. It is hypothesized that higher freshwater discharge and more frequent wind events in early spring 2007 were the driving factors behind the observed shift in bloom timing. The delay of the phytoplankton bloom resulted in a later and lower zooplankton biomass peak, and in a shift in zooplankton species composition. The implications of these changes for the survival of juvenile sockeye salmon are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it