MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W40491312

Inspiratory CO2 increases orthostatic tolerance during repeated tilt.

2001· article· en· W40491312 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupine positionPresyncopeMedicineAnesthesiaHead-Down TiltHeart rateTilt (camera)Orthostatic vital signsBlood pressureCerebral blood flowCardiologyInternal medicineMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The partial pressure of end tidal CO2 (PetCO2) is known to decrease with head-up tilt. Decreases in arterial CO2 reduce cerebral blood flow (CBF) and may increase the incidence of presyncope. We measured cerebral and central cardiovascular responses to repeated tilt where: 1) PetCO2 was allowed to change with tilt (eucapnic): and 2) PetCO2 was clamped at supine levels (isocapnic). METHODS: In eight healthy subjects breath-by-breath measurements were made of ventilation (VE) and PetCO2 along with beat-by-beat measurements of blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and middle cerebral artery mean flow velocities (MFV). Following 30-min in the supine position, a series of six 10-min 90 degrees head-up tilts were performed, with 30-s of supine between each. Presyncopal subjects were returned immediately to the supine position. RESULTS: Statistical comparisons were made between the supine, and the first and last minute of the first tilt. BP, HR responses were not different between the eu- and isocapnic conditions; however, by the end of the first tilt VE was significantly higher than supine. MFV and BP at brain level decreased and HR increased from supine to tilt. MFV was higher in the isocapnic compared with the eucapnic condition but decreased from the beginning to the end of the first tilt in both conditions (i.e., tilt #1: eucap. 49.4 to 46.7; isocap. 65.0 to 59.6 cm s(-1); p < 0.05) while the BP remained constant. Five subjects were presyncopal in the study. With isocapnic tilt, presyncopal time was not reduced but was extended in four of the five subjects (2.2, 5.5, 6.3 and 31 min) yet at presyncope the values for MFV, BP and HR were the same in both conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Inspiratory CO2 contributed to increased MFV at the beginning of tilt and increased orthostatic tolerance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it