Redeeming the Word: Religious Experience as Liberation in Erna Brodber's Fiction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sociological literature of the Caribbean indicates that religion, both Christian and syncretic, has played a positive role in the liberation movements of the region, and that it continues to play a role, albeit in less overtly public ways, in the Caribbean's continuing construction of itself. The literary criticism and creative literature of the Anglophone Caribbean have, by and large, downplayed this positive aspect of religion. The focus has been predominantly on its historically negative aspects as a tool of oppression, deprivation and misdirected heroism, and, simultaneously and alternatively, on its presence as a diffuse strand in a larger matrix of cultural manifestation. In the latter type of representation, religion has been subsumed under folk culture, which in its turn has been subsumed under nationalism, the rubric which directed Anglophone Caribbean writing and criticism up to the 1980's. The paper examines the fictions of Erna Brodber, which seem to represent a shift away from this perspective. Brodber not only re-creates religious experience as the organizing dynamic of liberation, but also recasts religious experience within a language and etymology radically removed from those which characterize the rhetoric of nationalist liberation. Her epistemology in this project is equally removed from the frames of diaspora, globality and feminism within which her work is usually analyzed. I argue that in the final analysis Brodber makes a shift away from the historicist and humanist tradition that governs current literary and cultural discourse, and I seek to identify the bases and implications of this radical shift.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".