Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stoler, Mark A. The 'Pacific First' Alternative in American World War II Strategy. The International History Review 2 (July 1980). Vlahos, Michael. The Naval War College and the Origins of War-Planning against Japan. Naval War College Review 32 (July-August 1980). Muir, Malcolm, Jr. Rearming in a Vacuum: United States Navy Intelligence and the Japanese Capital Ship Threat, 1936-1945. The Journal of Military History 54 (October 1990). Graybar, Lloyd J. American Pacific Strategy after Pearl Harbor: The Relief of Wake Island. Prologue 12 (Fall 1980). Alexander, Joseph H. The Turning Points of Tarawa. MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History 9 (Summer 1996). Boyd, Carl. American Naval Intelligence of Japanese Submarine Operations Early in the Pacific War. The Journal of Military History 53 (April 1989). Holzimmer, Kevin C. Walter Krueger, Douglas MacArthur, and the Pacific War: The Wakde-Sarmi Campaign as a Case Study. The Journal of Military History 59 (October 1995). Perras, Galen Roger. Eyes on the Northern Route to Japan: Plans for Canadian Participation in an Invasion of the Kurile Islands-A Study in Coalition Warfare and Civil-Military Relationships. War and Society 8 (May 1990). Petillo, Carol M. Douglas MacArthur and Manuel Quezon: A Note on an Imperial Bond. Pacific Historical Review 48 (February 1979). Weingartner, James J. Trophies of War: US Troops and the Mutilation of Japanese War Dead, 1941-1945. The Pacific Historical Review 61 (February 1992). Huston, John W. The Impact of Strategic Bombing in the Pacific. The Journal of American-East Asian Relations 3 (Summer 1995). Gentile, Gian P. Shaping the Past Battlefield, 'For the Future': The United States Strategic Bombing Survey's Evaluation of the American Air War Against Japan. The Journal of Military History 64 (October 2000). Dewberry, Suzanne. The Pacific Coast Hooligans of World War II. Prologue 31 (Winter 1999). Falk, Stanley L. Japanese Strategy in World War II. Military Review 42 (June 1962). Seno, Sadao. A Chess Game with No Checkmate: Admiral Inoue and the Pacific War. Naval War College Review 26 (January-February 1974). Celardo, John. Shifting Seas: Racial Integration in the United States Navy, 1941-1945. Prologue 23 (Fall 1991). Gallicchio, Marc. After Nagasaki: General Marshall's Plan for Tactical Nuclear Weapons in Japan. Prologue 23 (Winter 1991). Hagan, Kenneth J. American Submarine Warfare in the Pacific, 1941-1945: Guerre de course Triumphant, in Gunter Bischof and Robert L. Dupont, eds. The Pacific War Revisited (Louisiana State University Press, 1997). Yarrington, Gary A. World War II: Personal Accounts- Pearl Harbor to V-J Day. Prologue 25 (
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".