Draft human rights guidelines for pharmaceutical companies, comments on draft guidelines for pharmaceutical companies, press release for draft guidelines for pharmaceutical companies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paul Hunt, UN Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, has launched for public consultation draft Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in relation to Access to Medicines. Consisting of some 50 provisions, the draft Guidelines were launched on 19 September 2007 at the University of Toronto, Canada. They are available for comment until 15 May 2008. It is important that the consultative process is as transparent as possible. Accordingly, we are approaching the authors of all comments received on or before 25 February 2008 and asking permission to place their comments in the public domain. All comments received after 25 February will automatically be placed in the public domain. A list of the contents of this zip can be found at: http://www.essex.ac.uk/hrc/practice/right-to-health.aspx
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.075 | 0.283 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.045 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.078 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".