Collier international business insolvency guide
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A three-volume treatise examining the complex, but increasingly common, subject of cross-border insolvency and multi-jurisdictional bankruptcy. Volume one, Law of the United States, covers aspects of bankruptcy law and practice in the United States for understanding by attorneys who may not deal with US bankruptcy law on a daily basis. Coverage includes: the United States legal system; the principal provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code; dealing with liquidation and reorganization; and the treatment of foreign insolvency cases in the United States. It also includes an appendix containing copies of significant international initiatives in the treatment of cross-border insolvencies, including the UNCITRAL Model Law and the EU Regulation on Proceedings. Volumes two and three, Insolvency Law of Selected Nations, contain 36 chapters. Each country-specific chapter explains the most significant issues germane with respect to the particular country, such as: general legal system; commercial law; dispute resolution mechanism; insolvency system; liquidation procedure; reorganization procedure; and handling of cross-border insolvencies. Countries covered include: Argentina; Ireland; Australia; Israel; Austria; Italy; Bahamas; Japan; Belgium; Korea; Brazil; Mexico; Canada; Netherlands; Czech Republic; New Zealand; Demark; Nigeria; European Union; Philippines; France; Poland; Germany; Russia; Hong Kong; Spain; Hungary; Thailand; India; Turkey; Indonesia; United Kingdom; China; Malaysia; and South Africa. This title is updated annually and the price quoted includes three months of updates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it