MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W40901603

Seedling Inoculation Screening Technique to Identify Resistance to Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines a Causal Agent of Soybean Sudden Death Syndrome

2005· article· en· W40901603 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shrishail S. Navi, Xiaobing Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueIowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusarium solaniSeedlingInoculationResistance (ecology)BiologyAgronomyHorticulture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sudden death syndrome (SDS) caused by Fusarium virguliforme (FV) formerly F. solani f. sp. glycines is one of the major yield reducing diseases of soybean (Glycine max). There is concern among producers due to noticeable expansion in geographical array of SDS and the associated potential yield losses. Yield loss due to SDS in the top 10 soybean producing countries varies from 2x103 in Canada to 0x105metric tons in the United States (Wrather et al., 2001). Techniques developed earlier for SDS resistance screening were inconsistent in foliar symptoms expression. Hence, objectives of the study during 2002–2005 were to develop a simple, rapid, repeatable, quantifiable and season independent resistance screening technique to measure relative tolerance of soybean varieties to SDS and understand infection process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University)Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207