MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W410674346

Photography in the Convent: Grey Nuns, Québec, 1861

2002· article· en· W410674346 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Colleen Skidmore

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitContext (archaeology)PhotographyHistory of photographyOrderlinessValue (mathematics)HistoryArt historyGeniusArtVisual artsSociologyArchaeologyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The photograph Grey Nuns enjoys canonical status among connoisseurs and scholars of nineteenth-century photography in Canada, mainly because of its aesthetic value and the artistic genius credited to the photographer, George Ellisson. A focus on the subjects of the photograph and on the historical context in which it was taken reveals another dimension of its significance as part of the visual history of the Sisters of Charity of Quebec. The subjects, Celina and Seraphine Roy, were the first postulants to join the convent on its founding in 1849; during vocations lasting more than six decades each, these women assumed a variety of administrative roles and expanded the congregation and its work through eastern Quebec. The abundance and orderliness of the portrait photographs in the collection of the Sisters of Charity of Quebec show that such portraits were considered an important part of the historical record, documenting and linking the convent’s members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207