MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W41153701

Retrospective serological survey of antibodies to porcine circovirus type 1 and type 2.

2000· article· en· W41153701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Virus Infections Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorcine circovirusSerologySeroprevalenceVirologyCircovirusPopulationBiologyAntibodyIndirect immunofluorescenceVeterinary medicineImmunofluorescenceImmunologyMedicineVirusEnvironmental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A retrospective serological survey was performed to determine the presence of antibodies to porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) in serum samples collected from sows at slaughterhouses in Canada in 1985, 1989, and 1997. Each serum sample was tested by indirect immunofluorescence on PCV-free PK15 cells, on PCV1-infected PK15 cells and on PCV2-infected PK15 cells. For the 3 years studied, sera positive to PCV1 and PCV2 were identified and the number of sera positive for PCV2 was greater than the number of sera positive for PCV1. The results indicated 1) that PCV2 appears to be the main PCV type circulating in the Canadian pig population, 2) that PCV2 had been circulating in the Canadian pig population at least 10 years before the postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) was reported, and 3) that serological evaluation using PCV1 underestimates the seroprevalence of PCV2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it