Психовегетативные аспекты гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезни
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined 71 patients with gastroesopyageal reflux disease (GERD), including 29 with erosive reflux disease (ERD), 42 with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). The diagnosis put on the basis of anamnesis, clinical research, fibrogastroduodenoscopy, condominium exposure pH-metry of the esophagus and stomach. All patients are conducted psychometric study using a scale of situational and personal anxiety Spielberg-Hanin, techniques, diagnostic indicators and forms of aggression and A. Bass, A. Dark, Toronto scale, method for investigating the level of subjective control, a clinical questionnaire for the identification and evaluation of neurotic states, Personality Inventory of Behterev Institute (PIBI) and study the state of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) determined by the level of serotonin in the blood. A group of patients with NERD and ERD varied position locus of control personality, degree of anxiety, irritability, type of relationship to the situation of the disease and the condition of vegetative support of activity ANS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.097 | 0.126 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it