MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W411729771

Exploring recreational angler heterogeneity in the Okanagan

2011· article· en· W411729771 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. M. King

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Environmental Valuation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource OperationsFreshwater Fisheries Society of British Columbia
KeywordsRecreationGeographyFisheryBiologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Participation in recreational angling in British Columbia has declined since the early 1990's.Therefore, new fishery management strategies are being designed to attract anglers to the Okanagan region of British Columbia (Region 8).This study used a Discrete Choice Experiment and a Latent Class Model to identify unique groups of anglers within the Okanagan (Region 8), and to evaluate if the new management strategies align with anglers preferences for fishery characteristics.The results of the study identify and describe four heterogeneous segments of fishers, and determine that the new management strategies will provide attractive fishing opportunities for most Okanagan (Region 8) angler segments if they are implemented.These findings are supported by a Decision Support Tool which can be used by fishery managers to evaluate and refine management strategies for small mountain lakes in the Okanagan (Region 8).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.042 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicEconomic and Environmental ValuationFrench-language works237,207