MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stressful tranquility

2011· book-chapter· en· W411934971 on OpenAlexaff
John R. King

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and soil sciences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbiotic componentAgricultureResistance (ecology)Natural (archaeology)BiologyEcologyGeographyNatural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Plants are exposed to unusual, even extreme, environmental conditions, daily, seasonally, or from time to time depending on where they live. Beneath the benign face of the natural green world, plants are waging battles constantly against difficulties posed by their environments. Because these stresses often lead to reduced health in plants, just as they do in animals, they are also of considerable interest to agricultural scientists. Stressed crops usually produce lower yields. Understanding how plants cope with and respond to environmental stresses (often called abiotic stresses to distinguish them from those caused by diseases and predators, which are biotic stresses) is, therefore, important to breeders whose job it is to develop crop varieties with resistance to stresses while maintaining high yields. WHAT IS STRESS? The word stress was used first by engineers to explain what happens when a force is applied to an object; strain is the change in the object caused by the stress. For example, an elastic band can be stressed by forcing it to expand; strain is how much the band is stretched by the force applied. Stresses and strains in the physical world can often be precisely applied and measured. DEFINING “BIOLOGICAL” STRESS AND STRAIN In a cultivated context Anything that does not allow a plant to reach its full potential is a stress which will have a consequent strain, such as lower growth or seed production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicPlant and soil sciencesFrench-language works237,207