MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W41441134

Arguing Breast Cancer: The Feminist Views of Two Women's Health Activists

2003· article· en· W41441134 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen’s Studies Quarterly · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilencePoliticsBreast cancerGender studiesBreast cancer awarenessFeminismCancerSociologyMedicinePolitical scienceLawArtAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fact that we are here and that I speak now these words is an attempt to break that silence and bridge some of those differences between us, for it is not difference which immobilizes us, but silence. -Audre Lorde, The Cancer Journals Feminism's brilliance is found in this recognition that the body is not simply personal, that there is a politics to sex, that personal and political life are intermeshed. -Zillah Eisenstein, Manmade Breast Cancers In early 2001, Anne Kasper, a longtime women's health activist and founding member of the U.S. Women's Health Movement, and two partners began a support service for women with breast cancer. Calling it Finding My Way, the three sought to put their many years of work with women who had faced breast cancer to the service of women in the metropolitan Washington, DC, area, and elsewhere, who would struggle with a breast cancer diagnosis. Anne sent an E-mail to her friends and colleagues in women's health, asking them to let interested others know about this new service. One woman who received the E-mail was Sharon Batt, a breast cancer activist in Canada and author of Patient No More, a landmark book on the politics of breast cancer. Sharon took strong exception to the idea of Finding My Way and wrote Anne to that effect. An exchange of letters followed. Despite some early charges and countercharges, Sharon and Anne continued their exchange over the course of several months. What follows is their open-ended dialogue, an attempt to understand their differing feminist views on a range of political, ethical, economic, and social issues that surround breast cancer. May 9, 2001, via E-mail Dear Friends, As many of you know, I have recently started a support practice for women with breast cancer. My partners and I are currently working with clients and are pleased that they have found our service to be of help to them. Will you help us let other people know about Finding My Way by forwarding this message to people in your E-mail address book? (We are available to work with clients in DC in person and out-side the DC metro area by phone and E-mail.) Thanks in advance for your support. Anne Kasper [Attachment] Finding My Way: Support for Women with Breast Cancer When diagnosed with breast cancer, women often feel overwhelmed by the choices they must make, at a time when they feel most vulnerable. More and more, women find that they need someone to turn to-someone with an intimate and expert knowledge of the cancer experience who can guide them through cancer diagnosis, treatment, and recovery. That someone is a breast cancer coach. Finding My Way is a new and unique service for women with breast cancer. We are breast cancer coaches. We offer women the support they need to manage the complexities of life with breast cancer. We help each woman solve the myriad of problems she faces from the time of diagnosis through recovery. We maintain a current database of resources and services specific to women with breast cancer. And, we provide the personal, one-on-one support that every woman with breast cancer would like to have but, until now, was unable to find. (While we work with each woman to support her as she takes difficult steps, we are not a substitute for, nor do we interfere with, the advice of her doctors and health care providers.) Personal Breast Cancer Coaches Anne S. Kasper, Ph.D., has been a women's health expert for more than 25 years and has worked with women with breast cancer for more than 12 years. She is an editor and author of a new book, Breast Cancer: Society Shapes an Epidemic. Anne has a special interest in encouraging women to be advocates for their health. Jane M. Lincoln, M.S.W., has been an oncology social worker for over 12 years working in a variety of settings with breast cancer survivors. She worked at the George Washington University Cancer Center from 1989 to 2000. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it