MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W41441134

Arguing Breast Cancer: The Feminist Views of Two Women's Health Activists

2003· article· en· W41441134 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne S. Kasper, Sharon Batt

Notice bibliographique

RevueWomen’s Studies Quarterly · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueObesity and Health Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSilencePoliticsBreast cancerGender studiesBreast cancer awarenessFeminismCancerSociologyMedicinePolitical scienceLawArtAesthetics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The fact that we are here and that I speak now these words is an attempt to break that silence and bridge some of those differences between us, for it is not difference which immobilizes us, but silence. -Audre Lorde, The Cancer Journals Feminism's brilliance is found in this recognition that the body is not simply personal, that there is a politics to sex, that personal and political life are intermeshed. -Zillah Eisenstein, Manmade Breast Cancers In early 2001, Anne Kasper, a longtime women's health activist and founding member of the U.S. Women's Health Movement, and two partners began a support service for women with breast cancer. Calling it Finding My Way, the three sought to put their many years of work with women who had faced breast cancer to the service of women in the metropolitan Washington, DC, area, and elsewhere, who would struggle with a breast cancer diagnosis. Anne sent an E-mail to her friends and colleagues in women's health, asking them to let interested others know about this new service. One woman who received the E-mail was Sharon Batt, a breast cancer activist in Canada and author of Patient No More, a landmark book on the politics of breast cancer. Sharon took strong exception to the idea of Finding My Way and wrote Anne to that effect. An exchange of letters followed. Despite some early charges and countercharges, Sharon and Anne continued their exchange over the course of several months. What follows is their open-ended dialogue, an attempt to understand their differing feminist views on a range of political, ethical, economic, and social issues that surround breast cancer. May 9, 2001, via E-mail Dear Friends, As many of you know, I have recently started a support practice for women with breast cancer. My partners and I are currently working with clients and are pleased that they have found our service to be of help to them. Will you help us let other people know about Finding My Way by forwarding this message to people in your E-mail address book? (We are available to work with clients in DC in person and out-side the DC metro area by phone and E-mail.) Thanks in advance for your support. Anne Kasper [Attachment] Finding My Way: Support for Women with Breast Cancer When diagnosed with breast cancer, women often feel overwhelmed by the choices they must make, at a time when they feel most vulnerable. More and more, women find that they need someone to turn to-someone with an intimate and expert knowledge of the cancer experience who can guide them through cancer diagnosis, treatment, and recovery. That someone is a breast cancer coach. Finding My Way is a new and unique service for women with breast cancer. We are breast cancer coaches. We offer women the support they need to manage the complexities of life with breast cancer. We help each woman solve the myriad of problems she faces from the time of diagnosis through recovery. We maintain a current database of resources and services specific to women with breast cancer. And, we provide the personal, one-on-one support that every woman with breast cancer would like to have but, until now, was unable to find. (While we work with each woman to support her as she takes difficult steps, we are not a substitute for, nor do we interfere with, the advice of her doctors and health care providers.) Personal Breast Cancer Coaches Anne S. Kasper, Ph.D., has been a women's health expert for more than 25 years and has worked with women with breast cancer for more than 12 years. She is an editor and author of a new book, Breast Cancer: Society Shapes an Epidemic. Anne has a special interest in encouraging women to be advocates for their health. Jane M. Lincoln, M.S.W., has been an oncology social worker for over 12 years working in a variety of settings with breast cancer survivors. She worked at the George Washington University Cancer Center from 1989 to 2000. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,042
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,087

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0420,047
Communication savante0,0160,012
Science ouverte0,0030,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0220,031
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,084
Tête enseignante GPT0,472
Écart entre enseignants0,388 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWomen’s Studies QuarterlyMême sujetObesity and Health PracticesTravaux en français237 207