La politique française envers les États pontificaux sous la monarchie de Juillet et la Seconde République (1830-1851). Thèse de doctorat (Ph.D.) d’histoire soutenue le 10 avril 2006 à l’Université de Montréal, devant un jury composé de Paul Létourneau (président), Samir Saul (directeur de la thèse), Pietro Boglioni, Todd Poterfield et Robert S. Alexander (examinateur externe, University of Victoria).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’etude de la politique etrangere de la France envers les Etats pontificaux au XIXe siecle met en lumiere plusieurs grands enjeux de cette epoque car elle resulte de la conjugaison de divers interets lies a l’evolution politique de la France, au contexte general de l’Europe et aux considerations religieuses attribuables au statut particulier du pape, en tant que souverain temporel et chef spirituel. Face a ces elements divergents, nous avons voulu determiner quelle etait la ligne directric...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".