MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W41758945 · doi:10.1093/pch/14.9.578

Re: S Ratnapalan, MS Rayar, M Crawley. Educational services for hospitalized children. Paediatr Child Health 2009;14(7):433-6

2009· article· en· W41758945 on OpenAlexaffabout
P Gervais

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsCanadian Paediatric Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParagraphPediatricsLibrary scienceChild healthFamily medicineHumanitiesPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: I would like to bring to the attention of the editorial board and readers of Paediatrics & Child Health, the article intitled “Educational services for hospitalized children”, published in a past issue of Paediatrics & Child Health. Although the authors of this article were well intentioned, and their subject of query valuable, their methodology seemed to lack depth, their Web site review and telephone calls seemed incomplete, and their review of Quebec paediatric hospitals contained a few notable inaccuracies. Let me quote parts of the article: “The Montreal Children's Hospital and the Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine are under the McGill University Health Centre umbrella...” (page 433, last paragraph). “There are no other children's hospitals in the province of Quebec” (other than the Montreal Children's Hospital, the Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, and the Shriners Hospital for Children – page 436, first paragraph). The Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine is one of the largest children's hospitals in Canada, and its clinical, academic and research achievements are wellknown throughout North America, Europe and many other countries. To mistake its academic affiliation (it is affiliated with the University of Montreal) denotes a lack of rigueur in the authors' fact-checking process. Furthermore, the authors write that there are no other children's hospitals in the province, while there are two other major children's hospitals. The Centre mère-enfant du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CHUQ), in Quebec City, affiliated with the Université Laval, boasts 51 neonatal intensive care unit beds, eight paediatric intensive care unit beds and 81 paediatric beds; the teaching staff comprises approximately 50 paediatricians, specialists and subspecialists. The Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), affiliated with the Université de Sherbrooke, has approximately 25 neonatal intensive care unit beds, six paediatric intensive care unit beds and 40 paediatric beds, and has a teaching staff of approximately 40. Both of these centres offer educational services to their patients via the help of one bilingual teacher at each centre, who works full time in the case of the CHUQ, and three days per week in that of the CHUS. The services are offered to children who are hospitalized for more than three days, and for grade levels from the first year of primary school to the last year of secondary school. The teachers are provided by the respective local school boards. Please note that there are also rehabilitation or psychiatric facilities that have been overlooked. As a board representative from Quebec, let me express to the authors my regrets that their research process was not more thorough. The Caring for Kids Web site provides functioning links to the CHUQ, CHUS and Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine Web sites, with contact information for queries, and should members experience much difficulty with the French language, Canadian Paediatric Society board representatives can provide easy assistance. The information above was a 10 min phone call away, and was not at all “difficult” to obtain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0890.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicChild and Adolescent Health→French-language works237,207→