MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W418980809 · doi:10.71781/14377

Représentation de la révolution grecque dans la presse écrite du Bas-Canada (1821-1831)

2008· dissertation· fr· W418980809 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Constant Tzournavelis

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2008
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce mémoire, vise à organiser une représentation de la révolution grecque, à partir du dépouillement de la presse écrite du Bas-Canada. L'étude porte sur les années 1821 à 1831. J'ai dégagé une typologie en cinq catégories des documents inhérents à la presse qui permet de cerner une connaissance empirique de la lutte des Grecs pour leur indépendance : journaux étrangers, ouvrages, documents officiels, lettres, parole éditoriale. De plus, les catalogues d'offres de la librairie Fabre pour la décennie 1820 furent mis à contribution. La prise de parole et le discours des rédacteurs canadiens sont étudiés en regard des matériaux susceptibles de forger l'opinion publique. Finalement, le discours canadien sur la révolution grecque nous renseigne sur l'imaginaire des lettrés, leur formation classique, une construction de l'image de l'Orient, une conception de la liberté, de l'Histoire et le sens donné à une lutte de libération nationale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207