MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200001787 · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002839

Acute High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modulates Corticospinal Excitability in Older Adults

2021· article· en· W4200001787 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason L. Neva, Brian Greeley, Briana Chau, Jennifer K. Ferris, Christina B. Jones, Ronan Denyer, Kathryn S. Hayward, Kristin L. Campbell, Lara A. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Coastal HealthUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationMedicineSilent periodFacilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationHigh-intensity interval trainingInterval trainingUpper limbMotor cortexPhysical therapyStimulationInternal medicinePsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Acute exercise can modulate the excitability of the nonexercised upper limb representation in the primary motor cortex (M1). Measures of M1 excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are modulated after various forms of acute exercise in young adults, including high-intensity interval training (HIIT). However, the impact of HIIT on M1 excitability in older adults is currently unknown. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of lower limb cycling HIIT on bilateral upper limb M1 excitability in older adults. METHODS: We assessed the impact of acute lower limb HIIT or rest on bilateral corticospinal excitability, intracortical inhibition and facilitation, and interhemispheric inhibition of the nonexercised upper limb muscle in healthy older adults (mean age 66 ± 8 yr). We used single and paired-pulse TMS to assess motor evoked potentials, short-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, and the ipsilateral silent period. Two groups of healthy older adults completed either HIIT exercise or seated rest for 23 min, with TMS measures performed before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 30 min after (T2) HIIT/rest. RESULTS: Motor evoked potentials were significantly increased after HIIT exercise at T2 compared with T0 in the dominant upper limb. Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find any significant change in short-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, or ipsilateral silent period after HIIT. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that corticospinal excitability of the nonexercised upper limb is increased after HIIT in healthy older adults. Our results indicate that acute HIIT exercise impacts corticospinal excitability in older adults, without affecting intracortical or interhemispheric circuitry. These findings have implications for the development of exercise strategies to potentiate neuroplasticity in healthy older and clinical populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207