The grape MYB24 mediates the coordination of light-induced terpene and flavonol accumulation in response to berry anthocyanin sunscreen depletion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The presence of naturally-occurring color mutants in plants has permitted the identification of many regulatory genes implicated in the synthesis of discrete metabolic compounds, mostly anthocyanins and carotenoids. Conversely, transcription factors that coordinate more than one specialized metabolic pathway seem challenging to screen from a forward genetics’ perspective. We explored the relationship between different branches of the phenylpropanoid and isoprenoid pathways while examining an infrequent berry skin color variegation in grapevine. Red and white berry skin sections were compared at the genetic, transcriptomic and metabolomic levels showing that, as in most cultivated white grape varieties, the uncolored skin section convened the non-functional alleles of the anthocyanin regulators MYBA1 and MYBA2 , explaining the lack of pigments. In contrast, light-responsive flavonols and monoterpenes increased in anthocyanin-depleted areas. We disclosed an enrichment of the flavonol, terpene and carotenoid pathways among up-regulated genes from white-skin sections, accompanied by increased expressions of flavonol regulators and the still uncharacterized MYB24 gene. We used DAP-seq to examine the in vitro binding of affinity-purified MYB24 protein to genomic DNA and demonstrated its binding in the promoter regions of terpene (22) and carotenoid (6) genes, in addition to more than 30 photosynthesis and light-response genes, including the flavonol-regulator HY5 homologue (HYH). We confirmed the activation of TPS35 and HYH promoter:luciferase reporters in the presence of MYB24 and the grape bHLH MYC2, all of which correlate in their higher expression in white skin variegated sections. The integration of several datasets allowed to define a list of high confidence targets, suggesting MYB24 as a modulator of light responses including the synthesis of flavonoids (flavonols) and isoprenoids (terpenes, and putatively carotenoids). The correspondence between MYB24 and monoterpenes in all conditions surveyed implies that this regulatory network is broadly triggered towards berry ripening, and that the absence of anthocyanin sunscreens accelerates its activation most likely in a dose-dependent manner due to increased radiation exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".