Standard binding free energy and membrane desorption mechanism for a phospholipase C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peripheral membrane proteins (PMPs) bind temporarily to cellular membranes and play important roles in signalling, lipid metabolism and membrane trafficking. Obtaining accurate membrane-PMP affinities using experimental techniques is more challenging than for protein-ligand affinities in aqueous solution. At the theoretical level, calculation of standard protein-membrane binding free energy using molecular dynamics simulations remains a daunting challenge owing to the size of the biological objects at play, the slow lipid diffusion and the large variation in configurational entropy that accompanies the binding process. To overcome these challenges, we used a computational framework relying on a series of potential-of-mean-force (PMF) calculations including a set of geometrical restraints on collective variables. This methodology allowed us to determine the standard binding free energy of a PMP to a phospholipid bilayer using an all-atom force field. Bacillus thuringiensis phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (BtPI-PLC) was chosen due to its importance as a virulence factor and owing to the host of experimental affinity data available. We computed a standard binding free energy of -8.2±1.4 kcal/mol in reasonable agreement with the reported experimental values (-6.6±0.2 kcal/mol). In light of the 2.3-μs separation PMF calculation, we investigated the mechanism whereby BtPI-PLC disengages from interactions with the lipid bilayer during separation. We describe how a short amphipathic helix engages in transitory interactions to ease the passage of its hydrophobes through the interfacial region upon desorption from the bilayer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".