MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P096: Using CRISPR-Cas9 screens to identify microRNA involved in aggressive prostate cancer phenotypes

2021· article· en· W4200008328 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jonathan Tak-Sum Chow, Daniel K.C. Lee, Martino Gabra, Norman J. Fu, Keyue Chen, Leonardo Salmena

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCRISPRmicroRNADU145Prostate cancerCas9BiologyCancer researchIn silicoComputational biologyCancerGene knockoutMetastasisGuide RNAPhenotypeGeneBioinformaticsGeneticsLNCaP

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer diagnosis in Canadian men. For many, the tumour can remain “dormant” negating a need for treatment, but if the tumour progresses and becomes metastatic, prognosis is poor. Despite the introduction of new treatments, metastatic PCa remains a lethal and incurable disease. This is invariably due to the onset of castration-resistance in advanced cases producing a more aggressive tumour with increased metastatic potential. We hypothesize that microRNA can promote these aggressive PCa phenotypes due to their ability to regulate diverse gene networks simultaneously. Methods: We have generated miRKOv2, the second version of our microRNA CRISPR Knockout library using the latest on- and off-target scoring algorithms and other microRNA-specific features for CRISPR-Cas9 guide RNA (gRNA) design. miRKOv2 will be used in three separate screens to identify microRNA that are essential for PCa growth, microRNA that are involved in PCa metastasis, and microRNA that can confer castration-resistance, respectively. Results: Next generation sequencing of the plasmid miRKOv2 library showed a median gRNA coverage of ~1100X. In silico comparisons to other microRNA libraries demonstrate that miRKOv2 is a superior sgRNA library. DU145 cells stably expressing Cas9 are highly active and proof of principle growth assays demonstrate that essential gene knockout and subsequent decrease in cell viability is detectable. Generation of a Cas9+ PCa cell line panel and screens are ongoing. Conclusion: miRKOv2 is an improved microRNA-focused CRISPR library with high gRNA coverage. Proof of principle assays demonstrate that knockout of essential genes results in a reduction in cell viability, indicating that a CRISPR dropout screen is appropriate for our in vitro model. This project aims to identify microRNA dependencies in metastatic and castration-resistant PCa that can be leveraged into new biomarkers and therapies. Citation Format: Jonathan Tak-Sum Chow, Daniel K. C. Lee, Martino Marco Gabra, Norman Fu, Keyue Chen, Leonardo Salmena. Using CRISPR-Cas9 screens to identify microRNA involved in aggressive prostate cancer phenotypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P096.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207