MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200013693 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaa153

Corrigendum to: The role of illness acuity on the association between frailty and mortality in emergency department patients referred to internal medicine

2020· erratum· en· W4200013693 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Habibullah Pulok, Olga Theou, Alexandra M van der Valk, Kenneth Rockwood

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2020
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentAssociation (psychology)Emergency medicineGerontologyMedical emergencyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the original version of this manuscript, an error occurred in the abstract. For the line, `a minority (307; 38%) were classified as having low acuity (CTAS: 1–2)', `low' should read `high'. This has now been corrected and the author apologises for the error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0100.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAge and AgeingSame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207