MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200021190 · doi:10.12932/ap-240721-1196

Nivolumab-induced diffuse type 2 rhinosinusitis: A case report

2022· article· en· W4200021190 on OpenAlexaff
Firas Kassem, Yossi Rosman, Ilan Blau, Ben I. Nageris, Anna Zakharov, Ameen Biadsee

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNivolumabMedicineAnosmiaNasal congestionHistopathologyDermatologyInternal medicineGastroenterologySurgeryPathologyNoseCancerImmunotherapyDiseaseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor is used to treat advanced metastatic malignancies. Data showed that nivolumab can cause exacerbated response of T-Helper 2 cells and lead to airway inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To present the upper airway findings of a 69-year-old woman after treatment with nivolumab. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 69-year old woman with no history of chronic rhinosinusitis developed complaints of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and anosmia. These symptoms started after one year of treatment with nivolumab. Pale polyps were observed on fiberoptic endoscopy examination. A gradual increase in eosinophil blood counts was noted. On histopathology, heavy infiltrates of eosinophils were seen in the tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is used to treat various advanced metastatic malignancies, with a good safety profile. Nevertheless, physicians must be alert to the possibility of evolving type II inflammation in patients, as appropriate therapy can be provided to improve their quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Pacific Journal of Allergy and ImmunologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207