Texture-based Intraoperative Image Guidance for Tumor Localization in Minimally Invasive Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intraoperative tumor localization in a deflated lung in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is challenging as the lung cannot be manually palpated through small incisions. To do so remotely, an articulated multisensory imaging device combining tactile and ultrasound sensors was developed. It visualizes the surface tactile map and the depth of the tissue. However, with little maneuverability in MIS, localizing tumors using instrumented palpation is both tedious and inefficient. In this paper, a texture- based image guidance system that classifies tactile-guided ultrasound texture regions and provides beliefs on their types is proposed. The resulting interactive feedback allows directed palpation in MIS. A k-means classifier is used to first cluster gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based texture features of the ultrasound regions, followed by hidden Markov model-based belief propagation to establish confidence about the clustered features observing repeated patterns. When the beliefs converge, the system autonomously detects tumor and nontumor textures. The approach was tested on 20 ex vivo soft tissue specimens in a staged MIS. The results showed that with guidance, tumors in MIS could be localized with 98% accuracy, 99% sensitivity, and 97% specificity.Clinical Relevance- Texture-based image guidance adds efficiency and control to instrumented palpation in MIS. It renders fluidity and accuracy in image acquisition using a hand-held device where fatigue from prolonged handling affects imaging quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".