MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract LBA020: Targeting FGFR2c isoform, a novel therapeutic target with FGFR inhibitor in endometrial cancer

2021· article· en· W4200026444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Asmerom T. Sengal, Vanessa Bonazzi, Olga Kondrashova, Lewis Perrin, Naven Chetty, Deborah S. Smith, Antonio Gil‐Moreno, Eva Colás, Pamela M. Pollock

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFibroblast Growth Factor Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndometrial cancerOncologyCancerMedicineInternal medicineGene isoformCohortClinical trialDiseaseAlternative splicingCancer researchBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most frequently diagnosed gynaecological cancer. The majority of women with EC are treated surgically and have a good outcome, however 25-30% of patients presenting with metastases or recurrent disease do not have effective therapies and have <12 months survival. Recent investigations demonstrated radio-chemotherapy has little benefit for women with high-risk EC within the deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and p53 wild type (p53wt) molecular subtypes. We reported isoform switching from the FGFR2b (epithelial) splice-isoform to the FGFR2c (mesenchymal) splice-isoform in 40% of dMMR and 30% of p53wt ECs. This isoform switching was associated with adverse clinicopathologic markers, shorter recurrence free survival and disease specific survival in the Canadian cohort used to identify and validate the ProMisE molecular risk stratification approach. The objectives of the current study were i) to identify patient derived xenograft (PDX) models with FGFR2c expression and develop PDX derived organoids (PDXOs) for preclinical drug testing, ii) assess the efficacy of the BGJ398 FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi) in FGFR2c expressing models and generate preclinical data that would support an early phase clinical trial in FGFR2c stratified EC patients. Method: BaseScope RNA ISH was used to detect FGFR2c expression in patient tumours, PDX models and PDXOs. PDXOs derived from three independent PDX tumours were established from each of five PDX models (3 showing high FGFR2c expression, 2 showing low/no FGFR2c expression). Each PDXO culture was treated with 300nM BGJ398 (pan-FGFRi) or DMSO for 72 h and assessed using a live-dead assay and confocal microscopy. PDXs from three models were engrafted subcutaneously into 8 weeks female NSG mice and when tumours reached 100-150mm3, mice were randomized (4 mice/arm) and treated with 30mg/Kg BGJ398 or vehicle daily for 21 days. Tumours were measured 3x/week and mice sacrificed when tumours reached 900mm3. Results and conclusion: FGFR2c expression was higher in PDXs representing the dMMR and p53wt subtype compared to p53mut subtype and similar expression levels were seen between patient tumours, PDXs and PDXOs. In vitro FGFRi with BGJ398 showed significant cell death occurred in PDXOs with high FGFR2c expression (p< 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA). These in vitro findings were validated in vivo using PDX68 carrying a FGFR2 C383R mutation and PDX52 and PDX59, both showing FGFR2 isoform switching. Significant tumour growth inhibition and a ~2-fold increase in survival was seen in all three models (PDX68, p<0.0001 and p<0.007; PDX52, p<0.02 and P<0.03; and PDX59 P<0.0001 and P<0.0006 respectively). In conclusion, our investigation revealed FGFRi (BGJ398) was effective in EC PDX models representing both mutational activation and isoform switching of FGFR2. As FGFR isoform switching occurs most commonly in the dMMR subtype where immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved, we propose the combination of ICIs and FGFRi may be more effective in women with FGFR2 activation compared to ICIs alone. Citation Format: Asmerom T Sengal, Vanessa Bonazzi, Olga Kondrashova, Lewis Perrin, Naven Chetty, Deborah Smith, Antonio Gil-Moreno, Eva Colas, Pamela M Pollock. Targeting FGFR2c isoform, a novel therapeutic target with FGFR inhibitor in endometrial cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LBA020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicFibroblast Growth Factor ResearchFrench-language works237,207