Two Stages Thermal and Catalytic Cracking of Polyethylene Terephthalate to Fuel Production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PET (polyethylene terephthalate) is made up of polymerized repeating units of the ethylene terephthalate monomer (C10H8O4). PET is a recyclable plastic with the number 1 as its identification code. PET, which has a molecular weight of 192 gm/mole and contains 62.5 percent carbon, 33.3 percent oxygen, and 4.2 percent hydrogen, is utilized as synthetic fiber, polyester, plastic packaging, and soft drink containers all over the world. The main purpose of this study is to convert PET waste into liquid hydrocarbon fuel. Because PET use has risen significantly over the world, and the bulk of garbage is thrown into the soil rather than recycled, posing an environmental risk. During the heat breakdown phase, PET decomposes. It creates very strong and solid non-biodegradable terephthalic acid and benzoic acid complexes. To obtain liquid hydrocarbon fuel from PET, at 250-300℃, calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2 is used as a catalyst in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".