MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200037737 · doi:10.1016/j.str.2021.11.008

The respiratory supercomplex from C. glutamicum

2021· article· en· W4200037737 on OpenAlexafffund
Agnes Moe, Terézia Kovaĺová, Sylwia Król, David J. Yanofsky, Michael Bott, Dan Sjöstrand, John L. Rubinstein, Martin Högbom, Peter Brzezinski

Bibliographic record

VenueStructure · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCorynebacterium glutamicumChemistryBiochemistryHemeProtein subunitStereochemistryBacteriaBiologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corynebacterium glutamicum is a preferentially aerobic gram-positive bacterium belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria, which also includes the pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis . In these bacteria, respiratory complexes III and IV form a CIII 2 CIV 2 supercomplex that catalyzes oxidation of menaquinol and reduction of dioxygen to water. We isolated the C. glutamicum supercomplex and used cryo-EM to determine its structure at 2.9 Å resolution. The structure shows a central CIII 2 dimer flanked by a CIV on two sides. A menaquinone is bound in each of the Q N and Q P sites in each CIII and an additional menaquinone is positioned ∼14 Å from heme b L . A di-heme cyt. cc subunit electronically connects each CIII with an adjacent CIV, with the Rieske iron-sulfur protein positioned with the iron near heme b L . Multiple subunits interact to form a convoluted sub-structure at the cytoplasmic side of the supercomplex, which defines a path for proton transfer into CIV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueStructureSame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207