Blood withdrawal acutely impairs cardiac filling, output and aerobic capacity in proportion to induced hypovolemia in middle-aged and older women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blood donation entails acute reductions of cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy men. Whether these effects can be extrapolated to blood donor populations comprising women remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess the acute impact of blood withdrawal on cardiac function, central hemodynamics and aerobic capacity in women throughout the mature adult lifespan. Transthoracic echocardiography and O 2 uptake were assessed at rest and throughout incremental exercise (cycle ergometry) in healthy women (n = 30, age: 47–77 yr). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q̇) and peak O 2 uptake (V̇O 2peak ), and blood volume (BV) were determined with established methods. Measurements were repeated following a 10% reduction of BV within a week period. Individuals were non-smokers, non-obese and moderately fit (V̇O 2peak = 31.4 ± 7.3 mL·min –1 ·kg –1 ). Hematocrit and BV ranged from 38.0 to 44.8% and from 3.8 to 6.6 L, respectively. The standard 10% reduction in BV resulted in 0.5 ± 0.1 L withdrawal of blood, which did not alter hematocrit (P = 0.953). Blood withdrawal substantially reduced cardiac LVEDV and SV at rest as well as during incremental exercise (≥10% decrements, P ≤ 0.009). Peak Q̇ was proportionally decreased after blood withdrawal (P < 0.001). Blood withdrawal induced a 10% decrement in V̇O 2peak (P < 0.001). In conclusion, blood withdrawal impairs cardiac filling, Q̇ and aerobic capacity in proportion to the magnitude of hypovolemia in healthy mature women. Novelty: The filling of the heart and therefore cardiac output are impaired by blood withdrawal in women. Oxygen delivery and aerobic capacity are reduced in proportion to blood withdrawal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".