MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200040865 · doi:10.3138/mous.18.2.004

Fieldwork of the Canadian Institute in Greece in 2018

2021· article· en· W4200040865 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Brendan Burke, Dimitris Athanasoulis, Zisis Bonias, Bryan Burns, Tristan Carter, Alexandra Charami, Scott Gallimore, Margriet J. Haagsma, Sarah James, Sophia Karapanou, Dimitri Nakassis, Alcestis Papadimitriou, Jacques Y. Perreault, Laura Surtees

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Library scienceGeographyPolitical scienceArchaeologyHistoryMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The archaeological fieldwork conducted in Greece in 2018 under the aegis of the Canadian Institute in Greece (CIG) is summarized based on the presentation given by the director at the Institute’s annual Open Meeting in Athens in May 2019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0150.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of CanadaSame topicArchaeological Research and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207