MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Evaluation of Machine Learning Classifiers for Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Normal Cognition

2021· article· en· W4200042763 on OpenAlexaff
Payam Hosseinzadeh Kasani, Sara Hosseinzadeh Kassani, Yeshin Kim, Cheol‐Heui Yun, Seong Hye Choi, Jae‐Won Jang

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsDementiaMachine learningNaive Bayes classifierArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineRandom forestDecision treeComputer scienceDiseaseCognitionAlzheimer's diseaseStatistical classificationLogistic regressionSupervised learningMedicineArtificial neural networkPsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dementia has a negative impact on global healthcare that has become a serious concern worldwide. The most common cause, Alzheimer's disease, underlies the majority of dementia. The identification and accurate prediction of Alzheimer's disease in its initial stage is most critical, of which has several important practical applications. However, a reliable diagnosis remains a challenging task and requires a combination of methods based on important clinical information. Developing computer-aided diagnosis systems to support early Alzheimer's disease detection is essential for effective treatment planning. In this study, a nationwide cohort dataset, the Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer's disease is classified by using eight state-of-the-art supervised machine learning algorithms namely Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, XGBoost, Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Bagging and AdaBoost. The best performing model appeared to be the XGBoost classifier yielding an accuracy of 82.09%. Thus, the present research shows that the application of the machine learning model to the KBASE dataset will offer an efficient clinical classification of cognitively normal control individuals, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease patients and provides a framework for clinical decision systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC)Same topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207