High-Throughput Metabolic Profiling for Model Refinements of Microalgae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metabolic models are reconstructed based on an organism's available genome annotation and provide predictive tools to study metabolic processes at a systems-level. Genome-scale metabolic models may include gaps as well as reactions that are unverified experimentally. Reconstructed models of newly isolated microalgal species will result in weaknesses due to these gaps, as there is usually sparse biochemical evidence available for the metabolism of such isolates. The phenotype microarray (PM) technology is an effective, high-throughput method that functionally determines cellular metabolic activities in response to a wide array of entry metabolites. Combining the high throughput phenotypic assays with metabolic modeling can allow existing metabolic network models to be rapidly reconstructed or optimized by providing biochemical evidence to support and expand genomic evidence. This work will show the use of PM assays for the study of microalgae by using the green microalgal model species Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as an example. Experimental evidence for over 254 reactions obtained by PM was used in this study to expand and refine a genome-scale C. reinhardtii metabolic network model, iRC1080, by approximately 25 percent. The protocol created here can be used as a basis for functionally profiling the metabolism of other microalgae, including known microalgae mutants and new isolates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".