MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200051932 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zn7ha

FENOMENA MENURUNNYA INTEGRASI WARGA NEGARA TERKAIT TAWURAN REMAJA YANG TERJADI DI KABUPATEN BANDUNG BARAT

2021· preprint· id· W4200051932 on OpenAlexaff
Kania Hasna Nafisah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrasi merupakan hal yang penting untuk keharmonisan yang terjalin di lingkungan masayarakat Indonesia. Di zaman modern era globaliasi ini adanya penurunan satu kesatuan, banyak di kalangan generasi muda yang kurang kesadaran akan pentingnya saling membantu dan bersatu dalam kehidupan di lingkungan warga negara. Salah satu penyebab penurunan Integrasi ini adalah tawuran yang sering terjadi di masyarakat khususnya di kalangan remaja di daerah Kabupaten Bandung Barat yang menjadi alasan pecah belahnya masyarakat khususnya dikalangan anak muda. Oleh karena itu tulisan ini akan membahas aspek penyebab terjadinya tawuran remaja yang dilakukan secara studi pustaka. Dari hasil analisis aspek yang menjadi faktor tawuran yaitu psikologis sebagai remaja dan faktor lingkungan, hal tersebut sebab dari turunnya integrasi yang terjadi saat ini. Jika integrase dilakukan bersama-sama dengan serasi yang menghasilkan keharmonisan di kehidupan bermasyarakat maupun warga negaranya. Berdasakan atar belakang yang telah dipaparkan, penulis memilih menuliskan karya ilmiah dengan tema “Penurunnan Integrasi warga negara” yang bertempat di wilayah Kabupaten Bandung Barat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Methods and ImpactsFrench-language works237,207