A Novel Trust Model In Detecting Final-Phase Attacks in Substations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A substation’s security is paramount because it is an integral part of the Smart Grid for the transmission and distribution of electricity. Advanced persistent threats (APTs) have become the bane of the substation because they can remain undetected for a period until final attacks are launched. A lot of existing techniques may not be real-time enough to detect these final attacks. Trust, even though less investigated, can be used to tackle these attacks. In this paper, we present a trust model designed specifically for the Modbus communication protocol that can detect final attacks from APTs when a substation is compromised. This model is formed from the perspective of the substation device and was successfully tested on two publicly available Modbus datasets under three testing scenarios. The external test, the internal test, and the internal test with IP-MAC blacklisting. The first test assumes attackers’ IP, and MAC addresses are not part of the substation network, and the other two assume otherwise. Our model detected the attacks within each dataset and also revealed the attack behaviour within the two datasets. Our model can also be extended to other protocols, and this has been marked for future work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".