MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200056023 · doi:10.1063/5.0063049.4

10.1063/5.0063049.4

2021· dataset· en· W4200056023 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Broumand, Ali Asgarian, Markus Bussmann, Kinnor Chattopadhyay, Murray J. Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueDefault Digital Object Group · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Surface Properties and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakupSurface tensionSauter mean diameterMechanicsWeber numberBreak-UpRADIUSNozzleStrouhal numberMaterials scienceOpticsPhysicsTurbulenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamic behavior and disintegration mechanisms of a fan liquid sheet in a quiescent atmosphere are investigated over a broad range of differential injection pressures up to Δp≈70 bar through experiments, proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral analyses, and linear stability analysis (LSA). By fan liquid sheet, we mean a diverging and attenuating liquid stream emanating from a flat fan nozzle with high velocity. High spatiotemporal resolution backlit images reveal the formation-growth-fragmentation process of bag-like structures along the fan liquid sheets, which we predict to be responsible for the overall breakup of the sheets through a mechanism known as “wavy corridor.” Therefore, we propose a conjugate model based on LSA to take into account the role of different shear and surface tension-driven instabilities in defining the liquid sheet intact radius and primary droplet sizes. The predictions of LSA from the dynamic features of the liquid sheets, which mainly depend on the sheet Weber number We, are consistent with the quantitative results obtained from the POD and spectral analyses of the images. While the Strouhal number St and the intact radius R of the fan liquid sheets reduce like We−1/3 with increasing We, the volume median diameter of primary droplets decreases like We−11/12. An image feature consolidation technique along with a machine-learning technique, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, was used to estimate the mean diameter of spray droplets with a large range of sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8080.715

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDefault Digital Object GroupSame topicPlant Surface Properties and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207