MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200059059 · doi:10.14393/ufu.di.2021.583

Vivências e compreensões de professores do ensino fundamental acerca de aspectos políticos que incidem sobre seu trabalho

2021· dissertation· pt· W4200059059 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V L C Parreira

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the understanding that the issues that affect education are reproductions of broader social problems, this study aims to investigate political aspects related to the experiences, understandings and practices of elementary school teachers, considering the context of neoliberal rationality. The theoretical basis comes from the propositions of Dardot and Laval about neoliberalism, understood not only as an ideology, economic policy or as a facet of current capitalism, but fundamentally as a rationality that shapes our subjectivities and governs everyone. We also rely on the Social Psychology of Work, which questions the current work model and seeks to understand it from the workers' experience. As for the method, it is a qualitative research carried out through a case study, the study location was a municipal school. As techniques, participant observations were carried out in the school, the writing of a field diary, and semi-structured interviews with five elementary school teachers; the interviews occurred during the pandemic caused by COVID-19 and, therefore, were carried out remotely. The data analysis process was carried out through the transcription of the interviews, fluctuating and detailed readings of the transcripts and the field diary, prior categorization of the data and, finally, the construction of meaning categories, with the identification of four main categories, being 1) the conceptions of education presented by teachers, 2) political aspects, such as public educational policies, policy influence on education issues and political manifestations of teachers, 3) experiences of overload and illness related to the organization of work, 4) coping tactics used to deal with the problems presented in the previous categories. As main results, it was found that 1) teachers understand education in its broad character and attribute to education the role of developing students' critical awareness. However, there is a contradiction between the discourse and its actual practices, some of which are based on meritocratic logic and which help to reproduce relations of oppression; 2) teachers have a critical view of social issues that permeate education, and are attentive to political issues, such as bills that affect their work; 3) neoliberal rationality and business logic enter the educational process and materialize in educational public policies, with the proposal of standardized curricula and assessments, formulated from private interests, with the purpose of developing skills and competences in students; 4) teachers point out the precariousness of teaching work, the overload, exacerbated demands, experiences of suffering and illness, showing that the neoliberal rationality also affects the organization of work; 5) such problems were aggravated in the context of pandemics and remote teaching, as teachers needed to individually adapt to new demands, without institutional or government support, and experienced greater levels of overload and suffering; 6) facing this, teachers use individual tactics to get around the problems, collective ways of coping were not mentioned. It is concluded that basic education, educational policies and the organization of teaching work are captured by the neoliberal rationality, which inserts the business logic into the school and makes the subjects start to live on such precepts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation Pedagogy and PracticesFrench-language works237,207