MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exact Solution of Modulation Waveforms for MMCs Operating with Circulating Current Suppression Control (CCSC) Strategy

2021· article· en· W4200059700 on OpenAlex
Ramin Parvari, Shaahin Filizadeh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE 22nd Workshop on Control and Modelling of Power Electronics (COMPEL) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformModulation (music)ConvertersControl theory (sociology)Bernoulli's principleCapacitorCurrent (fluid)VoltagePulse-width modulationModular designElectronic engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)Acoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces explicit modulation waveforms for Modular Multilevel Converters (MMCs) operating with the Circulating Current Suppression Control (CCSC) strategy. With the assumption that the circulating current is DC only, a Bernoulli differential equation governing the modulation waveform is derived. By the exact solution of the derived equation, modulation waveforms of the MMC with higher accuracy are obtained. The proposed solution method yields much more accurate results than conventional methods for MMCs in medium-voltage applications wherein submodule capacitor sizes may be relatively smaller than transmission-level MMCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it