HOARDS OF THE 4th - 3rd CENTURIES BC PANTICAPAEUM BRONZE COINS FROM THE EXCAVATIONS IN THE MANITRA SETTLEMENT (THE EASTERN CRIMEA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В 2018 г. в ходе раскопок античного поселения Манитра, расположенного в Восточном Крыму, были найдены три клада пантикапейских бронзовых монет IV-III вв. до н. э. Два из них (24 и 62 монеты) относятся к начальной фазе денежного кризиса на Боспоре и были сокрыты в первой четверти III в. до н. э. Третий клад (10 монет) принадлежит более раннему времени, последней трети IV в. до н. э. Публикуемые комплексы являются ценным свидетельством экономического состояния Боспора и денежного обращения на хоре в конце IV - первой четверти III в. до н. э. Дата двух первых кладов ок. 290-275 гг. до н. э. является terminus post quem для жизнедеятельности поселения Манитра. In 2018, three hoards of the 4 and 3 centuries BC Panticapaeum bronze coins were found during excavations in the Settlement of Manitra located in the Eastern Crimea, in Kerch environments. Two of them (consisting of 24 and 62 coins) belong to the initial phase of the monetary crisis on the Bosporus and were concealed in the first quarter of the 3 century BC. The third hoard is dated to the last third of the 4 century BC, consisting of ten coins. The assemblages are the valuable evidence for the Bosporan economic situation and currency in the chora in the late 4 to the first quarter of the 3 century BC. The latest coins in the hoards date to c. 290-275 BC, providing a terminus post quem for the end of the Manitra settlement life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".