Deep active reinforcement learning for privacy preserve data mining in 5G environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frequent pattern mining (FIM) identifies the most important patterns in data sets. However, due to the huge and high-dimensional nature of transactional data, classical pattern mining techniques suffer from the limitations of dimensions and data annotations. Recently, data mining while preserving privacy is considered as an important research area. Information privacy is a tradeoff that must be considered when using data. Through many years, privacy-preserving data mining (PPDM) made use of methods that are mostly based on heuristics. The operation of deletion was used to hide the sensitive information in PPDM. In this study, we used deep active learning to protect private and sensitive information. This paper combines entropy-based active learning with an attention-based approach to effectively hide sensitive patterns. The constructed models are then validated using high-dimensional transactional data with attention-based and active learning methods in a reinforcement environment. The results show that the proposed model can support and improve the effectiveness of decision-making by increasing the number of training instances through the use of a pooling technique and an entropy uncertainty measure. The proposed paradigm can achieve data sanitization by the hiding sensitive items and avoiding to hide the non-sensitive items. The model outperforms greedy, genetic, and particle swarm optimization approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".