Prediction of post transarterial chemoembolization MR images of hepatocellular carcinoma using spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a critical role in the planning and monitoring of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) treated with locoregional therapies, in order to assess disease progression or recurrence. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI sequences offer temporal data on tumor enhancement characteristics which has strong prognostic value. Yet, predicting follow-up DCE-MR images from which tumor enhancement and viability can be measured, before treatment of HCC actually begins, remains an unsolved problem given the complexity of spatial and temporal information. We propose an approach to predict future DCE-MRI examinations following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) by learning the spatio-temporal features related to HCC response from pre-TACE images. A novel Spatial-Temporal Discriminant Graph Neural Network (STDGNN) based on graph convolutional networks is presented. First, embeddings of viable, equivocal and non-viable HCCs are separated within a joint low-dimensional latent space, which is created using a discriminant neural network representing tumor-specific features. Spatial tumoral features from independent MRI volumes are then extracted with a structural branch, while dynamic features are extracted from the multi-phase sequence with a separate temporal branch. The model extracts spatio-temporal features by a joint minimization of the network branches. At testing, a pre-TACE diagnostic DCE-MRI is embedded on the discriminant spatio-temporal latent space, which is then translated to the follow-up domain space, thus allowing to predict the post-TACE DCE-MRI describing HCC treatment response. A dataset of 366 HCC's from liver cancer patients was used to train and test the model using DCE-MRI examinations with associated pathological outcomes, with the spatio-temporal framework yielding 93.5% classification accuracy in response identification, and generating follow-up images yielding insignificant differences in perfusion parameters compared to ground-truth post-TACE examinations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".