Pantomyma Theater as a Phenomenon of Modern Spectacular Culture: Specifics of Additional Transmission Channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article reveals the peculiarities of the representation of pantomime theaters in the conditions of new broadcasting channels (on the example of Internet sites and social networks), as well as theorizes socio-cultural conditions that at the present stage determine communication in pantomime theater. The study found that modern pantomime theater, as a phenomenon of entertainment culture, actively represents itself in the network space, which has become an additional channel for broadcasting performances, expanding the boundaries of the audience and providing other opportunities for viewing; rethinks the relationship with the viewer, his role in communication, as well as his own place in the modern world. It is shown that social networks and Internet sites are important platforms for self-presentation of pantomime directors and spectators, discussion and formation of possible directions for further development. In addition to photos and videos (photos of troupe members, videos of pantomimes, videos from tours and festivals), the theaters' websites provide textual information about the history of the group and the theater's activities at the present stage, textual annotations of performances, reviews and forms of communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".