Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Der Place Ville Marie befindet sich im Herzen von Montreal, direkt am Boulevard René‐Lévesque. Dieser Platz wurde renoviert, um so zu einem der beliebtesten städtischen Treffpunkte Montreals zu werden. Aus den vormals vier Lichtkuppeln wurde ein großer zentraler Eingangspavillon aus Glas geschaffen, der einen direkten Zugang in den daruntergelegenen Bereich bietet. Zur Leistung von seele gehörte die Planung und Montage des 45 × 15 m großen Glasdaches, das sich ca. 1,2 m über dem Boden befindet. Das etwa 680 m 2 große Dach besteht aus 15 × 2,5 m großen Isolierglasscheiben. Diese werden von Glasträgern aus 8 × 12 mm Verbundsicherheitsgläsern (VSG) aus teilvorgespanntem Glas (TVG) mit einer Höhe von 900 mm getragen. Im Rahmen des vorliegenden Beitrages werden Besonderheiten der Konstruktion und Montage diskutiert. Für die Verbindungstechnik wird beispielsweise eine Kombination aus Bolzen‐ und Einlaminiertechnik verwendet. Im Eingangsbereich kragen Glasschwerter mehrere Meter aus und stellen damit besondere Anforderungen an die Statik. Um die hohen Schneelasten abzutragen, werden in diesem Sonderbereich 14‐fach‐Laminate verwendet. Design Engineering and Installation of Glass Structures in Canada. The Place Ville Marie is located in the heart of Montreal, directly on the Boulevard René‐Lévesque. This square has been renovated to become one of the most popular urban meeting places in Montreal. The former four dome lights were transformed into a large central glass entrance pavilion that provides direct access to the area below. seele's services included the planning and installation of the 45 × 15 m glass roof, which is located approx. 1.2 m above the ground. The approximately 680 m 2 roof consists of 15 m × 2.5 m insulated glass panels. The regular roof panels are supported by 8 × 12 mm laminated safety glass panels with a height of 900 mm. In the context of this article, special features of construction and installation are discussed. For example, a combination of bolting and laminating techniques is used for the joining technique. In the entrance area, glass beams cantilever several metres and thus place special demands on the statics. In order to bear the high snow loads, 14‐ply laminates are used in this special area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".