Bibliographic record
Abstract
Angelical Conjunction"In 1702, the Boston Puritan minister Cotton Mather published his Magnalia Christi Americana in seven folio volumes.The purpose of this monumental religious history was to record the "Remarkables of Divine Providence" that had illuminated the experience of the first generation of New England Congregationalists.With this generation already dying out, Mather was fearful that the fervour of their successors was growing cold.1 One of the Calvinist preachers whose piety and orthodoxy he celebrated in Book 3 of the Magnalia was the Reverend Thomas Thatcher (1620-1678), famous for instructing the deaf and for converting Quakers.But Mather also drew attention to Thatcher's "accomplishments" as "an excellent physician."He that for his lively ministry was justly reckoned among "the angels of the churches," might for his medical acquaintances, experiences, and performances, be truly called a Raphael.Ever since the days of Luke the evangelist, skill in physick has been frequently professed and practised by persons whose more declared business was the study of divinity.To say nothing of such monks as [St Giles, Constantine the African, John Damascene or Pietro Torrigiano de' Torrigiani] and to say nothing of Henry Bochelt, a Bishop, or of Albicus, an Arch Bishop, or of Ludovicus Patavinus, a Cardinal, or of John XXII, a pope, all of whom were notable 1 Magnalia Christi Americana: or, The Ecclesiastical History of New-England, from its first Planting in the year 1620.Unto the Year of Our Lord, 1698.In Seven Books … (London, 1702).References and quotations used here are from the first American edition, published in two volumes in Hartford, Connecticut in 1820.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".