MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hydro-generators fault diagnosis with short-time-wavelet-entropy and variational auto-encoder

2021· article· en· W4200102585 on OpenAlexaff
Ryad Zemouri, Simon Bernier, Olivier Kokoko, Arezki Merkhouf

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletStatorEntropy (arrow of time)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMagnetic fluxDiscrete wavelet transformPattern recognition (psychology)Wavelet transformAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsMagnetic fieldElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The prognosis and health management (PHM) of hydroelectric plants are full of difficulties caused by the complexity of the hydro-generators where each machine is different and almost unique. At industrial level, several tools are used to monitor the generator condition. Among these tools, the measurement of magnetic stray flux is one which is gaining interest. This measurement is generally based on an inductive sensor and mainly mounted near the stator. The main advantages of the magnetic stray flux are the non-invasive nature and the simplicity of its implementation. In this work, the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) is used to decompose the stray flux signal. Short-Time-Wavelet-Entropy (STWE) is then applied to extract the features from the sub-bands. Finally, a variational auto-encoder (VAE) is used in an unsupervised learning process to structure the STWE signatures of more than 400 stray flux measurement collected on real hydroelectric plants. The obtained results show that the VAE has well captured the features from the wavelet entropy (WE) signatures. An analysis of the resulting latent space shows a strong correlation between a given trajectory in the reduced space and an increase of the WE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207